- Jun 17, 2021
-
-
Jonas Platte authored
-
Jonas Platte authored
-
Jonas Platte authored
-
Jonas Platte authored
-
Jonas Platte authored
-
Jonas Platte authored
-
- Jun 14, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
Fixes #35
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- Jun 12, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- Jun 09, 2021
-
-
hamidreza kalbasi authored
-
hamidreza kalbasi authored
-
hamidreza kalbasi authored
-
hamidreza kalbasi authored
-
hamidreza kalbasi authored
-
hamidreza kalbasi authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- May 30, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- May 29, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- May 28, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- May 27, 2021
-
-
Gabriel Souza Franco authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- May 26, 2021
-
-
phesch authored
-
- May 24, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- May 23, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- May 22, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
- May 21, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
-
Timo Kösters authored
- get encryption keys over federation - optimize signing key storage - rate limit parsing of bad events - rate limit signature fetching - dependency bumps
-
- May 17, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
I'm a bit torn on the "auth check based on the current state of the room". It can mean multiple things: 1. The state of the room before the homeserver looked at the event at all. But that means if a message event from a user arrives, but we didn't see their join event before, we soft fail the message (even though we would find the join event when going through the auth events of the event and doing state res) 2. The state of the room after doing state-res with the event and our previous room state. We need to do this state resolution to find the new room state anyway, so we could just use the new room state for the auth check. The problem is that if the incoming event is a membership leave event, the new room state does not allow another leave event. This is obviously the wrong option. 3. The state of the room after doing state-res with the state **before** the event and our previous room state. This will mean a lot more calculations because we have to run state-res again We used 2. before and now use 1. again
-
Timo Kösters authored
currently they will only be sent if a PDU has to be sent as well
-
- May 14, 2021
-
-
Timo Kösters authored
-